Hi Paolo, let's stay focused -
Paolo Vecchi wrote: > > Do you have concrete suggestions on changing the actual > > proposal? > > Well, yes. That's what the rest of the email you replied to was about. > Can I see the adjustments/changes to the proposal then please? > I'm not even suggesting that each individual proposing a project should sign > it, only when the project is being proposed by or it becomes controlled > mostly by a single company. > That then seems entirely unrelated to a putative attic process? > Another example could be LOWA (LibreOffice WebAssembly), which is a > promising project developed mostly by Allotropia AFAIK. > > That's why months ago I've asked you to lead by example by officially > present the project to TDF in a couple of pages stating the objectives and > what TDF could expect to deliver to the community while Allotropia pursues, > rightly, its commercial interests. If you followed up we would have had > already a document on which to base the agreement we need to welcome other > projects. > Let's discuss that else-thread please. Again, new projects are a different area entirely. And as one of the people funding LOWA, I find it irritating that my contributions are met with demands, instead of gratitude. I've not yet asked TDF anything in return. Meanwhile, I'd be most happy if people interested in LOWA would come & join our FOSDEM talk about it: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/event/lowa/ Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
