My principal issue with all this wonderful activity, is I would like, rather desparately, for all the researchers involved to discuss their methods, and try to calibrate them against a reference of some kind. Right now it feels as though we are too often comparing meters to feet to hippos, which will have devastating effects when attempting to land.
http://www.taht.net/~mtaht/uncle_bills_helicopter.html So far the only things I am comfortable with are (of course), flent, and crusader, and a new entrant from broadband forum that leverages udp - https://github.com/BroadbandForum/obudpst/issues/9 Rather than be critical of everyone elses tests, I tried to be critical of my own, here: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/flaws_in_flent/ At the moment I have no idea what the apple RPM test is supposed to measure anymore. One of the big ones (not) showing up in most data sets is "survivorship bias". Is anyone testing videoconferencing quality? A mere MOS out of videoconferencing traffic relative to other load would please me. On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 8:14 AM Livingood, Jason via Bloat <[email protected]> wrote: > > When it rains, it pours… There's another measurement program focused on fixed > wireless (LEO and 5G) - in addition to others I have posted the last few > months. Signup is at https://measuringwirelessamerica.com/signup > > > > Personally – looking forward to ~6 months from now when all these various > programs start to present papers & share data / results. > > > > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat -- Surveillance Capitalism? Or DIY? Choose: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/an_upgrade_in_place/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
