> On 16 Mar, 2019, at 11:38 pm, Holland, Jake <[email protected]> wrote: > > SCE needs a lot of details filled in, but it's so much cleaner that it > seems to me there's reasonably obvious answers to all (or almost all) of > those detail questions, and because the semantics are so much cleaner, > it's much easier to tell it's non-harmful.
And we're actively working on filling in those details. They haven't yet made it as far as an I-D, partly because we'd like to do at least some preliminary testing first. > where does BBR fit into all this? The present version of BBR, which I've actually seen, ignores ECN completely. I'm told that the new version which I haven't yet seen, does *something* with ECN, but I'm unclear on what. I think it'll be up to the BBR developers to decide how to incorporate SCE information, using conventional TCPs as a guide as to what is reasonable - or to ignore it, which is also a valid design choice. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
