On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9 May, 2012, at 4:04 am, Dave Taht wrote: >
> So overall we have an AQM that provides a low-latency signal of appropriate > magnitude to TCPs when the link is genuinely congested, and gets out of the > way when it isn't. Combined with a fair queueing discipline (eg. SFQ or > QFQ), I think this will turn out to be an excellent default setting for all > sorts of equipment. What would it take to get this into a DSL modem (at > either end of the link)? David Woodhouse tossed a copy of the paper on his machine before getting on a plane. He's been working on a ADSL device for quite some time. I don't know if he and his box are together, or separated. > > - Jonathan Morton > -- Dave Täht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
