LGTM2

/Daniel

On 2023-11-23 10:11, Yoav Weiss wrote:
LGTM1

These all seem like useful improvements! :)


On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:14 PM Jeremy Roman <[email protected]> wrote:



    On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:10 AM Yoav Weiss
    <[email protected]> wrote:



        On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman
        <[email protected]> wrote:


                    Note: This intent email spans three Chromestatus
                    entries for different sub-features that we
                    experimented with together and would like
                    permission to ship together in M121.


                    Contact emails

            [email protected], [email protected],
            [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]


                    Explainer

            https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md


                    Specification

            https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html


                    Summary

            (1) An extension to speculation rules syntax that lets the
            browser obtain URLs for speculation from link elements in
            a page. They may include criteria which restrict which of
            these links can be used.


        Any specific parts of the explainer/spec that cover this one?


    Sure:
    https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/triggers.md#document-rules
    
https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html#document-rule-predicate-matching
    
https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html#find-matching-links


That's very useful, thanks!!




            (2) Adding the eagerness field to the speculation rules
            will let the developers control how eagerly the browser
            preloads links in order to balance the performance
            advantage against resource overhead. This field accepts
            one of "conservative", "moderate", "eager", or "immediate"
            strings as the value, and it is applicable to both
            "prefetch" and "prerender" actions and both "list" or
            "document" sources. If not explicitly specified, list
            rules default to "immediate" and document rules default to
            "conservative".


            (3) Currently developers can only specify speculation
            rules using inline script tags. The proposed feature
            provides an alternative through the "Speculation-Rules"
            header. Its value must be a URL to a text resource with
            "application/speculationrules+json" MIME type. The
            resource's rules will be added to the document's rule set.



                    Blink component

            Internals>Preload
            
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EPreload>


                    TAG review

            https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/721


                    TAG review status

            Issues addressed (TAG still has reservations)


                    Chromium Trial Name

            SpeculationRulesPrefetchFuture


                    Link to origin trial feedback summary

            
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13cJcoygFD64UcQH-P30dXCLbdD6SXpQwhpOUym64KXw/edit?usp=sharing


                    Origin Trial documentation link

            
https://github.com/WICG/nav-speculation/blob/main/chrome-2023q1-experiment-overview.md


                    WebFeature UseCounter name

            SpeculationRulesDocumentRules
            SpeculationRulesSelectorMatches
            SpeculationRulesHeader
            SpeculationRulesExplicitEagerness


                    Risks



                    Interoperability and Compatibility

            Because authors cannot rely on document rules being
            evaluated (or preloading generally), applications which
            use them should function correctly in other browsers and
            should continue to function correctly were the feature to
            be deprecated. Of course, ideally other browsers do find
            it compelling to implement this feature.


            Similar reasoning applies to the response header and
            eagerness field.



            /Gecko/: No signal
            (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/620)

            /WebKit/: No signal
            (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/54)

            /Web developers/: Positive
            
(https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/L3mpXE1x3Zk/m/VvbMZrcsAQAJ)
            positive feedback from Akamai and use within Chrome on
            web.dev <http://web.dev>

            /Other signals/:


                    Activation

            Some developers might not be immediately aware of which
            URLs they can prefetch or prerender without side effects;
            this risk is reduced if they primarily use the feature for
            same-origin URL patterns they are familiar with.



                    Security

            See
            
https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/speculation-rules.html#security-considerations.



                    WebView application risks

            Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing
            APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android
            WebView-based applications?



                    Debuggability

            Speculative loading which occurs is visible in the Network
            panel and the new Preloading panel. Console warnings are
            logged when several types of issues are encountered.



                    Will this feature be supported on all six Blink
                    platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS,
                    Android, and Android WebView)?

            Yes (though some capabilities vary per platform)


                    Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
                    
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?

            Yes

            
https://wpt.fyi/results/speculation-rules?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
            
<https://wpt.fyi/results/speculation-rules?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>
            Some tests cover behavior which isn't enabled by default
            (even if experimental web platform features are on).



                    Flag name on chrome://flags



                    Finch feature name

            SpeculationRulesPrefetchFuture


                    Requires code in //chrome?

            False


                    Tracking bug

            https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1371522
            https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1406595
            https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1366940


                    Estimated milestones

            Shipping on desktop         121
            OriginTrial desktop last    120
            OriginTrial desktop first   110

            Shipping on Android         121
            OriginTrial Android last    120
            OriginTrial Android first   110

            OriginTrial webView last    120
            OriginTrial webView first   110



                    Anticipated spec changes

            A URLPattern change was made to facilitate this, and
            document rules will be affected by upstream changes to
            URLPattern. Similarly, upstream changes to CSS selectors
            will affect document rules which use selectors to match.
            Some minor changes to how links are identified may happen
            in the future. We anticipate most changes to be compatible.


                    Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status

            https://chromestatus.com/feature/5112150536749056
            https://chromestatus.com/feature/5091678266851328
            https://chromestatus.com/feature/5069400512659456


                    Links to previous Intent discussions

            Intent to prototype:
            
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2B5JZsPqZakqnGx2zgreGEfRCJ1Xrr16cL2gcqGF7577dFhvsw%40mail.gmail.com
 Intent
            to Experiment:
            
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3-0rLTZePzc/m/VNHWAdAGDQAJ
            Intent to Extend Experiment:
            
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACuR13epuEiXzbO3HJq0O9eum5_parJYHWHuje7QztZRd-s56w%40mail.gmail.com


            This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform
            Status <https://chromestatus.com/>.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
            from it, send an email to [email protected].
            To view this discussion on the web visit
            
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACuR13dJ%2BLypC7QmGmwvoGn3%2BhPs77bDa-NFDWTw0bA5WDhsWA%40mail.gmail.com
            
<https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CACuR13dJ%2BLypC7QmGmwvoGn3%2BhPs77bDa-NFDWTw0bA5WDhsWA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfX%2BNm3m5tsOv6VZsAzZeOeBkbYb8%2BUQmfBqabKjv0gyHw%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfX%2BNm3m5tsOv6VZsAzZeOeBkbYb8%2BUQmfBqabKjv0gyHw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/58f3233e-d925-4b2a-af5d-c1216f07036d%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to