On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:58 PM Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 4:01 PM Rune Lillesveen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 3:38 PM David Bokan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sure, I'll start on a PR. >>> >>> Taking another look, there does seem to be some basic parsing of the >>> meta in CSS Viewport >>> <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-viewport/#viewport-meta>. It's still a >>> fairly early-stage spec but I wonder if it'd make more sense to just add >>> the `interactive-widgets` keyword there rather than bouncing it between the >>> two specs? I could also help flesh out the meta processing model more >>> generally there. >>> >> >> That parsing algorithm is something I wrote back in 2010 based on testing >> Safari on an iPod Touch, not looking at the WebKit source code. That part >> should just be ditched. >> > > David, I think that answers your question, but whether you want to put the > spec for this is fine really, as long as it gets review and some indication > of support from another browser vendor, likely Mozilla in this case. > s/whether/wherever/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYeWU%3D2iQ%2Bv7UJ%2B3HYhdOWLb5O%3DJMDXFP6Vm2467oUrVkg%40mail.gmail.com.
