LGTM1
Seems good to make this change now, as usage is low, but rising.

Please make sure you reach out to affected partners.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:21 PM Daseul Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:50 AM Yoav Weiss <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:06 PM 'Daseul Lee' via blink-dev <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Specification
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fs/pull/53/commits/618b663ebdc0f9842d7db3091baed5f75aa87534
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Updates the asynchronous methods (`flush()`, `getSize()`, `truncate()`)
>>> in `FileSystemSyncAccessHandle` in the File System Access API to
>>> synchronous methods. `FileSystemSyncAccessHandle` currently has a mix of
>>> sync and async methods, hindering the performance and the usability,
>>> especially for applications porting C/C++ to Wasm. This update will bring
>>> consistency in the API usage and improve the performance for Wasm-based
>>> libraries.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink>Storage>FileSystem
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EStorage%3EFileSystem>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/772
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> Pending
>>>
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> Compatibility:
>>>
>>> Changing a return type from Promise to value can break, only if Promise
>>> methods are directly used rather than `await`. However, we expect minimal
>>> breakage due to very low usage (~0.00002% page loads; zero usage queried
>>> via HttpArchive).
>>>
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that this usage is a loose upper bound of users
>> of the API, and not necessarily sites that are not using `await`?
>>
> Yes, that's correct. It includes any usage, whether it is `await` or
> `Promise.then()`
>
>
>> Does it include all the APIs that are planned to stop returning Promises?
>> Also, can you link the use counter?
>>
> For truncate() method as an example, here is the link for use counter:
> https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2/?sid=33c4e21724eb85df0bdc19ff775d0018
> Unfortunately, it times out for (unique) count clients, so the above link
> is filtered on Mac OX only. It is still very slow, though.
>

Thanks!
Here are the public link for the same counters:
Truncate - https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4019
Flush - https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4017
GetSize - https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4018


>
> Some other links:
> Page load %:
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4019
> Additionally, we tried querying HttpArchive directly, and 0 usage has
> returned.
>
> As a side note, we have an enterprise policy set up to guard this change
> to prevent breakage.
>
>>
>>
>>> The original API was shipped in M102 and targeted for partner usage, to
>>> which the changes may be communicated. In addition, all code snippets and
>>> examples in public documents use `await`, which does not cause any breakage.
>>>
>>> Interoperability:
>>>
>>> There are no interoperability risks expected. The design change was
>>> initially proposed and assessed from vendor feedback.
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fs/issues/7
>>>
>>>
>>> Gecko: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fs/issues/7#issuecomment-1226562961)
>>>
>>> WebKit: No signal
>>>
>>> Web developers: Strongly positive (https://github.com/whatwg/fs/issues/7
>>> )
>>>
>>> Other signals:
>>>
>>> Ergonomics
>>>
>>> Low ergonomics risks are expected. In fact, the goal of this change is
>>> to improve the ergonomics of the API by making all methods to return
>>> synchronously and make it easier to use on Wasm-ported applications.
>>>
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> Basic tooling: Autocomplete works as described in "New WebIDL/DOM
>>> interfaces and attributes".
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>
>>> No
>>>
>>> Desktop only now. Origin Private File System (including
>>> `FileSystemSyncAccessHandle`) is planned to be shipped on Android in the
>>> near future.
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> Flag name
>>>
>>> sync-access-handle-all-sync-surface
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>
>>> False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1338340
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> DevTrial on desktop
>>>
>>> 106
>>>
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/whatwg/fs/pull/53/commits/618b663ebdc0f9842d7db3091baed5f75aa87534
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5149644305203200
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPscNz4GPefX650W7y-z2-kDVpwChCWur1UJb2490ySm03jy2A%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPscNz4GPefX650W7y-z2-kDVpwChCWur1UJb2490ySm03jy2A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfV2pLDymOSM8faz2uLBiyffBhp8h5cuyvvPr01vOzEmTQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to