On 01/04/14 09:09, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 30-03-2014 19:18, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 30-03-2014 14:08, [email protected] escreveu: >> >>> I have double checked and yes both get built and installed. >>> >>> output of locate: >>> >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt5.so >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt5.so.1 >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt5.so.1.0.0 >>> >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt4.so >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt4.so.4 >>> /usr/lib/libpoppler-qt4.so.4.3.0 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Christopher >>> >> Christopher, >> >> Thanks for the info and for your time. Motivated by them, I studied more >> the subject. As ĸen, I prefer autotools and found out how to build both >> with them. >> >> Will create a ticket and fix the page. >> > Fixed at r12922. Ticket #4880. > > Thanks, Christopher for reporting and investigating this issue and > helping to solve it. >
Hello Fernando, I am glad that I was able to assist with the resolution. I am one of these people who hates to give up on a problem. It was just shear pig headedness on my part that caused me to try cmake. I just refused to believe that the upstream maintainers would create a product that would not install both wrappers at the same time. I look forward to seeing the fix that you made with auto-tools. As of last checking the svn book I did not see the changes. There was no point in you and the other developers wasting time on it, if you were not certain that it would work. For what ever reason the configure script as it was in the original is broken. Also there was a warning about not being able to create the documentation with cmake, though that could well be solved by adding another module to cmake. Regards, Christopher -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
