On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 08:55 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > That is indeed a typo that I just fixed. junit uses an uncommon naming > scheme and I used a more common one for the binary package.
By "uncommon naming scheme", are you perchance referring to the junit vs junit-dep distinction? Unrelated, I'm curious why the book points to a Debian/Ubuntu package for a jar package. Surely a reference to the upstream junit.org site would be more appropriate? Simon. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
