On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:30:02PM -0300, Fernando wrote: > This is known. Only noticed today. > > Found this discussion: > > <http://forums.famillecollet.com/viewtopic.php?id=2015> > > The person in that discussion does not want to tell more than pointing > the page: > > <https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commits/master/xulrunner> > > However, could understand if to solve should *not* use system libvpx or > if the problem is something else. > > Was reluctant of sending to support or dev. Please, let me know if I > have to send to dev or feel free to forward it there. > > Is it just me or somebody else has this problem? > I noticed this a few days ago, but I put it down to "new version of firefox, not as good as previous version, film at 11" and didn't bother to investigate - it's easy enough for me to open a new tab. I also noticed that google results seemed to have spurious results highlighted at the top, in one case from wikipedia ("definition of ..." for whatever I was searching for), in another case from duck duck go - for once that result actually was useful, unlike my normal searches at that site. It seems unlikely that a *highlighted* wikipedia entry would have had someone pay for it to appear at the top of the results.
So, I blame it on churn in the code. I find it very hard to believe that libvpx is involved. Firefox code is generally a pain to follow, and primarily aimed at some other OS. And I haven't read the link, I'll live with this as long as the basic functionality continues to work. FWIW, I think -support is the right list. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
