On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 16:28 -0500, [email protected] wrote: > The following Note is in the MesaLib documentation: > > "The libxml2 Python module must have been built during the installation > of libxml2 or else MesaLib build will fail." > > Should it perhaps read as follows: > > "Python must have been built during the installation of libxml2 or else > the MesaLib build will fail."
Yes, I see your point... the first wording is a little unclear... it sort of implies that the "libxml2 Python module" is a separate package. Though I don't think your version is quite right either - as read, it suggests that Python is built as part of the the libxml2 install. Hmm.. how about: "Libxml2 must have been built with Python support, or else..." To me, that puts the emphasis clearly on the libxml2 build, and its optional dependencies. Simon. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
