On 4/9/20 10:11 PM, Kevin Buckley via blfs-dev wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 04:15, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
We rarely change these files, but I agree that the naming is confusing.
I run into the problem at release time, but have never gotten to fixing
it. I'll see if I can do that today.
Thanks for bringing it up.
OK, I've updated the problem docbook pages at revision 22981. Please
check it out.
Primarily there was confusion between sgml, dtd, and xml. I changed the
titles of the dtd pages and made internal page changes to match.
-- Bruce
Looks like all that happened whileI was I asleep !
Personally, I'd still prefer the full version info, so
pst/xml/docbook50.xml
over
pst/xml/docbook5.xml
so as to match
pst/xml/docbook51.xml
although I see that in the SGML directory, you've also kept the dot
between the major and mnor versions, so
pst/sgml/docbook-4.5-dtd.xml
as opposed to
pst/xml/docbook-45-xml.xml
and I still think that
1) the version number should come last (less of an issue than (2) )
2) as they are all DTDs, you either put the type of DTD
in the name for all, or you don't, and you put the fact
that they're a DTD in the name for all, or you dont.
For me, assuming you want the dot between the major and mnor versions
pst/sgml/
docbook-sgml-3.1.xml
docbook-sgml-4.5.xml
pst/xml/
docbook-xml-4.5.xml
docbook-xml-5.0.xml
docbook-xml-5.1.xml
The only thing that cares about the file names is the parent xml file.
From the editor's standpoint, we can interpret the names, if needed,
with or without the dot.
Note that the content of these files does not change. They are not updated.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
