On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 12:15 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> On 12/3/19 1:49 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 21:44 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > I've been trying to update to the latest gtk+3, but have been getting
> > > massive failures during the regression tests.
> > > 
> > > Upon investigation, most of the failures are due to a .css file
> > > generated by sassc.  With some manual modification, the gtk+ tests are
> > > back to normal.
> > > 
> > > This problem seems to occur with sassc-3.6, but not sassc-3.5.  Upstream
> > > gtk maintainers and most other distros that we checked are still at
> > > sassc-3.5, although I can find references to both sassc-3.5.5 and sassc
> > > 3.6.1 on Arch.
> > > 
> > > In BLFS, the packages that use sassc are gnome-shell,
> > > gnome-shell-extensions, plasma, and gtk+3.  We currently have
> > > sassc-3.6.1 and libsass-3.6.3.
> > > 
> > > The question is whether we should roll back sassc/libsass to version 3.5
> > > or should just say that the test suite for gtk+3 is broken?
> > > 
> > > Opinions?
> > Probably related, but I had issues with libsass-3.6.3. The Gnome 
> > environment was
> > basically unusable. Things like gnome-terminal would not start most of the 
> > time.
> > I had to revert back to libsass-3.6.1, before things became stable again. I 
> > kept sassc at 3.6.1 .
> > This was all running under a VM. I don't run the gtk3 tests, so I cannot 
> > comment on that.
> > Probably due to this issue:
> > https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/303

Sorry, copy/paste issue, it should be 
https://github.com/sass/libsass/issues/3033

> 
> Hmm, That issue was closed in 2014.
> 
> > I see there are some recent commits in relation to this issue which I 
> > haven't tried out yet.
> 
> I did back off to libsass-3.6.1 and the gtk3 failures returned to 
> normal.  I'll revert the book to that.  Thanks for the feedback.
> 
>    -- Bruce

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to