On 08/15/2019 05:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:first... /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml-2.0.pc contents seems ok to meI did not even mention pkgconfig stuff, because I was rather sure libxml2 installed it identical for all of us, otherwise I would have expected trouble way before trying to install libreoffice. So I attempted to find a LO specific explanation...My guess the downloaded lxml lxml-4.1.1.tgz is not set/ready to work with libxml2? If you have an lxml already installed (libxml2 compatible), this could explain our building difference...That's it. I haven't, but it does explain the difference nevertheless. My libreoffice does not attempt to download/install lxml: checking for python lxml... no, and system does not provide python development headers, gla11y will only report widget classes and ids This is likely due to me having added --enable-python=no to libreoffice in the past, surely due to some build problem at that time that may have been python2 or python3 specific. This is a deviation from the book. Haven't missed any functionality because of that so far...
I confirm, configure parameter --enable-python=system set to --enable-python=no everything else equal Make lxml missing from tarballs and building is now successful. So we have a deviation from book and then other following book specification should have a trouble too... 1) Are other compiling libreoffice should have the trouble... (confirmed?) 2) What should we decide to be set in the book... a) python=no b) python-lxml mandatory -- seen "Linux from scratch" and looking for ISO files www.osukiss.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
