On 5/1/19 5:41 AM, Richard Melville via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 23:39, Thomas Trepl via blfs-dev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Am Dienstag, den 30.04.2019, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Roger Koehler via
    blfs-dev:
    On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 3:50 PM Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via
    blfs-dev wrote:
    > I've been noticing that sometimes pulseaudio consumes 100% of
    one core and
    > stays that way for hours.  In one case I can close every
    application on my
    > desktop and pulseaudio still runs at 100%.
    >
    > It doesn't really affect things because I have four cores and
    response stays
    > fine, but it shouldn't be happening.
    >
    > Has anyone else seen this?
    >
    >   -- Bruce

    Yes, but only on my AMD Phenom, and I think I've seen it across all
    releases from the past few years.  'killall -KILL pulseaudio'.

    At one time I removed all its config files and let it regenerate
    them when next used, but the issue remains.

    I've stopped using pulseaudio. ALSA seems to be able to meet all
    of my needs. I also noticed the LXDE desktop constantly maxing out
    one of cores (Intel), so I just use xfce.

    Thats my goal, too. I'd need a soundsystem on my host which can be
    controlled/accessed by mpd and it should be able to auto-connect to
    a bluetooth speaker. All that if possible without any user
    interaction, just be available after system boot. So far, PA worked
    ok (while not ideal as i have to do one mouseclick in X on the host
    to connect to the bluez device). Hope alsa can work with bluez well.
    And yes, xfce is a nice DE, i'm using it for years now, its the best
    fit in resource, stability and beauty


"Beauty", are you sure? It looks like something out of the 1990s, which, of course, is what it is.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. For many of us, beauty is in the clean functioning, stability, nice configuration tools, and relatively easy build of xfce. Other DEs have a significant amount of bloat. Some WMs have less overhead and some users like that. It all comes down to personal preference.

  -- Bruce


--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to