>On 2/17/19 10:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: >> On 2/17/19 3:15 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: >>> The intel xorg driver has a sed for i686. I assume that people who >>> use jhalfs will apply it even on x86_64. Is that a problem ? >>> >>> <para> >>> If you are building on i686, apply a sed to fix a type >>> mismatch. >>> </para> >>> >>> <screen><userinput remap="pre">sed -i "s/#define force_inline inline >>> __attribute__((always_inline))/#define force_inline inline/" >>> src/sna/compiler.h</userinput></screen> >> >> I don't have that in my script so I don't know for sure. >> >> I guess we need to make that >> >> case $(uname -m) in >> x86_64) sed '...' src/sna/compiler.h ;; >> esac >> >> But we can shorten up the pattern a lot. >> >> -r '/ inline/s/( inline).*$/\1/' >> >I've blindly applied the sed on x86_64, and there is no adverse effect >(I'm building on bare metal for tagging, with Intel embedded graphics) >Pierre
The latest source codes contains this patch: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=9e6e003e3468dca674ac848e2669af973da02fd4 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
