On 09/12/2018 09:14, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On 08/12/2018 23:30, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:11:03PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >>> >>> Excluding the archive and the .svn directories from the search, it goes down >>> to 70. Still a lot of work though. Do I understand correctly that we could >>> remove reference to P2, when it is an optional dependency (even if it cannot >>> be replaced with P3)? >>> >>> I've made a small xsl stylesheet to extract python2 dependencies. Here is >>> the >>> list: package plus dependency type. The stylesheet did not do well with >>> python >>> modules, but I think it is not that important. >> >> I think you are looking at an old version of the book, maybe 8.3 ? >> > > Oops, I was using whatever was there in my test directory, and it has not been > updated since September... For the record, the same list with a current book. > I've fixed Python modules, too: >
And it shows that deps for Python modules are fairly inaccurate. I think it is worth a ticket (I'll open it after finishing this message), where each module can be discussed in detail. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
