On 11/16/2018 09:21 AM, William Harrington wrote:
On 2018-11-15 08:09, Jean-Marc Pigeon via blfs-dev wrote:Hello,As reported earlier, I am not able to recompile sendmail-8.15.2. It is not fully proved but I have strong indication it is caused by openssl-1.1.[0i,1] Looking about this, I noticed LFS is openssl-1.1.1 BLFS is openssl-1.0.2p (LFS 2018-11-09, BLFS 2018-11-13) Is this done on purpose? (I am doubtful about it) Trouble ahead compiling sendmail (and other?) using opessl-1.1.1? Comments?, something I am overlooking?Here is a patch I've used with Sendmail 8.15.2 over a year ago. This uses OpenSSL 1.1.0
Many thanks, (it is most appreciated) but my "policy" is to avoid "messing" with upstream code. Found sendmail-8.16. Delta with book directives is very minimal. APPENDDEF(`confENVDEF',`-DSTARTTLS -DSASL -DLDAPMAP') APPENDDEF(`confLIBS', `-lssl -lcrypto -lsasl2 -lldap -llber -ldb -lresolv') APPENDDEF(`confINCDIRS', `-I/usr/include/sasl') (adding -lresolv) It is compiling and installing, but I can't say it working or not (my build-chaine is in total shamble and need to be re-etablished). Found s-nail, which could be good enough to replace mailx, it is compiling and installing too. Too early to propose/push a switch to Bruce. (mailx project seems to be dead and I am not expecting openssl-1.1 compatibility anytime soon). -- A bientôt =========================================================== Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: [email protected] SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca";> ===========================================================
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
