On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:24:05PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Also a few things I am seeking advice about: On the Mutt page, there is: "Mutt > will rebuild the html documentation if libxslt is present, then use that to > update the text manual - even if none of the specified browsers are present. > That will create an empty text file, so we will save the shipped file.", and > then, nothing is saved. Should this sentence be commented out? > I _thought_ I had noticed the omission of the copy when I updated to 1.9.3, and decided it was valid, but I've just now rebuilt and got an empty text manual. My memory says that I noticed it at a late stage, and never got around to updating my own script.
Trying to identify in which commit something disappeared is not easy, still looking - but it ought to be reinstated. Hmm, based on a suggestion at stackoverflow, of the form svn log --diff src/fozbo.cpp -r2222:HEAD suggests _I_ took it out in r19714, but trac doesn't show that: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/19714 Anyway, I'll reinstate it. ĸen -- Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth. - Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
