On 01/13/2018 04:21 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 04:14:12PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 01/13/2018 04:02 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
I'm afraid you lost me completely there. If it works for jhalfs, do
it - but please watch out for accidental future breakage.
It'll be clear enough once in place, and besides that, it's not like this
happens all that frequently. Ultimately, if you happen to run across a
situation where you have a reciprocal dependency, a circular dependency, or
where an LFS dependency needs to be rebuilt in BLFS before your new package
can be built against it, take a look at a like example from one of the other
four currently in the book for inspiration (once Pierre makes the needed
changes).
--DJ
Yes, I expect it to be clear enough when Pierre has applied it. I'm
concerned about remembering this if I ever notice a new circular
dependency.
Probably it will be in the template, but we don't use that when
adding to an existing page.
ĸen
Whoops. Thanks for catching my mis-reply.
--DJ
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
