On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:44:12PM +0100, Richard Melville wrote: > On 9 April 2017 at 22:45, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ken, I'm tagging on to the end of this post, not because I have an answer > to your issue, but because, coincidently, I'm looking at mailx at the > moment and I can see that you are the owner of the patch. >
For the moment, I don't have a problem (it built in the end) so I'm not actively looking for an answer. And I'm not sure that I own the patch - I took the fixes from debian and redhat. > I've found another issue which, maybe, could be added to your patch. Mailx > is supposed to look for NSS first before falling back to OpenSSL. I have > NSS installed and it didn't find it. On examining the config.log I can see > that it's looking in /usr/include/ssl.h when the NSS header is actually at > /usr/include/nss/ssl.h. In the book we create the /usr/include/nss > directory but this clearly breaks the mailx build. > > Richard It sounds like you are in a position the fix the patch and test it! ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
