On 23.07.2016 20:59, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 21.07.2016 23:59, via blfs-book wrote: >>> Author: renodr >>> Date: Thu Jul 21 14:59:16 2016 >>> New Revision: 17603 >>> >>> Log: >> >>> Added seds to subversion, libva, and libX11 to silence more libtool warnings >>> Typo fixes >>> >> Are you really going to add this to every package, just because it's anoying? > Not to *every* package. Most of them that I have run across don't complain > whatsoever. I would say 75% of packages I have built haven't complained. That > said, 15% have complained, and 10% don't use Libtool whatsoever. >> If you want to get rid of it, use a more elegant solution: >> >> Remove /usr/lib64 symlink when starting lfs build. Make sure nothing gets >> installed >> there by using apropriate switches to point to /usr/lib. I think I've ironed >> out all >> the cases that I've found when I was around, or >> >> Remove all *.la files in /usr/lib (but not its subdirectories). They are >> useless anyways. >> > If we weren't in the second half of the last month before release, I'd > consider suggesting that. That would require a bit more testing than I can > muster at the moment. Wouldn't that violate the FHS as well? >> >> >> > >
No sane distro ships *.la files in /usr/lib, and most of them respect FHS. So no, it wouldn't.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
