I also looked at LibTIFF 4.0.4beta last night, and the test passes there. It looks like they're trying to test the expected output of specific jpeg lib versions, and have changed the test to look at ranges of acceptable values instead. Copying just the test/raw_decode.c from LibTIFF-4.0.4beta to 4.0.3 allows all tests to pass on 4.0.3.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Matt Linscott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm following the BLFS-Dev 2015-02-28 book with an LFS-7.7rc1 x86_64 base, > and I'm getting a test failure in LibTIFF-4.0.3. Here is the output of my > test/test-suite.log: > > ================================================= > LibTIFF Software 4.0.3: test/test-suite.log > ================================================= > > # TOTAL: 81 > # PASS: 80 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > FAIL: raw_decode > ================ > > Pixel 0 did not match expected results. > Expect: 18 0 41 > Got: 15 0 18 > Pixel 64 did not match expected results. > Expect: 0 0 0 > Got: 0 0 2 > Pixel 512 did not match expected results. > Expect: 5 34 196 > Got: 6 36 182 > Pixel 0 did not match expected results. > Expect: 18 0 41 255 > Got: 15 0 18 255 > Pixel 64 did not match expected results. > Expect: 0 0 0 255 > Got: 0 0 2 255 > Pixel 512 did not match expected results. > Expect: 5 34 196 255 > Got: 6 36 182 255 > > For the BLFS book, I've walked through first first 5 chapters and chapter > 24 on X plus their dependencies. I've done all required + recommended > dependencies and most optional dependencies on each section. My only > deviation from the book was to install libxkbcommon, libtsm, and kmscon to > have full color support on my ttys. >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
