On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:34:43PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > OK, I've now read the patch, and it does seem to fix a potential > problem. If nobody beats me to it, I'll take a look this week to see > what upstream are doing, or failing that, the distros. Christopher > put me on the back foot by saying the patch came from a gentoo > message board - their useful patches usually get into their ebuilds. >
In fact, google found it (once I knew what to look for :) http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg43137.html and it has been committed : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg43164.html A slightly odd date in the git From line of our version, but the content seems the same. > But I would still feel more comfortable if somebody can explain in > what circumstances the original problem happens. > ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
