bitcoindev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Tim Ruffing
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Jon Atack
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bill MacDonald
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Mat Balez
• [bitcoindev] LNHANCE a soft-fork package 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] LNHANCE a soft-fork package Brandon Black
• [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation Tadge Dryja
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CIV - Post-Quantum Signature Aggregation adiabat
• [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Pre-BIP Discussion] Bitcoin Node Repository Consensus-Policy Separation Juan Aleman
• [bitcoindev] By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Frenchanfry
  • [bitcoindev] Re: By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Doctor Buzz
  • [bitcoindev] Re: By: Doctorbuzz1 {GitHub} Limit "Bulk Dust" with a default filter or consensus. Doctor Buzz
• [bitcoindev] segOP potential BIP discussion defenwycke
  • [bitcoindev] Re: segOP potential BIP discussion defenwycke
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: segOP potential BIP discussion 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] [Concept] Anticipation Pool - Off-chain scaling using miner-validated transaction forwarding Jakob Widmann
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Majorian
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies TokyoBitcoiner
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies yes_please
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Melvin Carvalho
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Martin Habovštiak
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Soft Fork Compromise on op_return to Resolve Current Bitcoin Controversies Melvin Carvalho
• [bitcoindev] op_return spam is beneficial Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] op_return spam is beneficial Erik Aronesty
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork TheWrlck
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Kyle Stout
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Edil Guimarães de Medeiros
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork 'Bitcoin Eagle' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Daniel Buchner
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Chris Riley
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork dathonohm via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork 'Bitcoin Eagle' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork onyxcoyote
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Lucas Barbosa
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Jal Toorey
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Reduced Data Temporary Softfork Max
• [bitcoindev] Public disclosure of 4 Bitcoin Core security advisories 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Full Disclosure: Debug console history storing sensitive info in bitcoin core v24.0-v30.0 /dev /fd0
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.3 Released 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] BIP54 implementation and test vectors 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: BIP54 implementation and test vectors Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.0 Released fanquake
• [bitcoindev] Add importprivkeys RPC blocktraveler
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Add importprivkeys RPC 'Email para newsletters' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Add importprivkeys RPC blocktraveler
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.3 Release Candidate 1 Available 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Aiden McClelland
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts 'Aiden McClelland' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts jeremy
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts 'Aiden McClelland' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Dingocoin
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Aiden McClelland
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts yes_please
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Aiden McClelland
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Aiden McClelland
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Chris Riley
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Aiden McClelland
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Chris Riley
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts 'Aiden McClelland' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Garlo Nicon
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts 'OJ' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Chris Guida
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Mempool Validation and Relay Policies via User-Defined Scripts bigshiny
• [bitcoindev] Compact block relay in knots using the extra pool /dev /fd0
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.3 Release Candidate 2 Available 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v29.2 Released Gloria Zhao
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Knots 29.2.knots20251010 released Luke Dashjr
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 29.2 Release Candidate 2 Available Gloria Zhao
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 30.0rc3 release candidate is available fanquake
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. PortlandHODL
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Garlo Nicon
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. jeremy
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Guus Ellenkamp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. jeremy
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Tonoski
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Keagan McClelland
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Casey Rodarmor
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. PortlandHODL
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Tonoski
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Michael Tidwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Michael Tidwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Bitcoin Error Log
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • [bitcoindev] Policy restrictions Was: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Policy restrictions Was: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Tom Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Doctor Buzz
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Garlo Nicon
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Limit ScriptPubkey Size >= 520 Bytes Consensus. Anthony Towns
• [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Tim Ruffing
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Garlo Nicon
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr Garlo Nicon
  • Re: [bitcoindev] On (in)ability to embed data into Schnorr waxwing/ AdamISZ
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Emoji Seed Mnemonics for Deterministic Keys Coperbyte Solutions
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Emoji Seed Mnemonics for Deterministic Keys /dev /fd0
• [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Erik Aronesty
  • [bitcoindev] Re: OP_CHECKUTXOSETHASH idea Eric Voskuil
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 30.0rc2 release candidate is available fanquake
• [bitcoindev] [0/4] A Bitcoin Scripting Proposal BIP Quartet Rusty Russell

• Earlier messages
• Later messages