> I have consistently supported CTV for upwards of 3 years now. This should be pretty clear based on a cursory read of my VAULT BIP's introduction: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0345.mediawiki#introduction
Sure but CTV has never been enough for what you personally want to do (your flavor of vaults). You need OP_VAULT, OP_CCV or OP_CSFS right? I don't mean to be a smart ass, I know how fiendishly difficult and frustrating this covenants maze is with so many subtly different views. But I think it is a fair challenge to try to understand exactly what you want/need and whether you're going to want CCV etc in addition at a later date or not. Thanks Michael On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 5:41 PM James O'Beirne <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 8:51 AM Michael Folkson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Having read that I assumed you would be working on CCV so I'm quite > > surprised that a month later you're now proposing that CTV and CSFS be > > prepared for activation. > > I have consistently supported CTV for upwards of 3 years now. This should > be pretty clear based on a cursory read of my VAULT BIP's introduction: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0345.mediawiki#introduction > > In fact, I was at one point listed as a co-author because I was championing > it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1482 > > I like CCV, but in my opinion it needs more time to be scrutinized by the > community. > > Best, > James -- Michael Folkson Personal email: [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAFvNmHSQDkR9L7SAu95FmfASdrdjFPUmohEncjNcPHx2q4_9Fw%40mail.gmail.com.
