On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 2:20 AM Chris Guida <[email protected]> wrote: > >Fees are under 3sat/vb; there's no attack. Excess block space is being > filled by low-value spam, but that's expected and, in a permissionless > system, unavoidable. > > This is just a temporary cease-fire while the spammers reload their > ammunition. There is obviously about to be another wave, otherwise what is > the point of eliminating OP_RETURN restrictions?
If they use OP_RETURN instead of putting data into the witness, they will exhaust their funds four times faster and store four times less data on the blockchain. Maybe the removal of OP_RETURN constraints in policy is a Trojan horse against spammers? -- Best regards, Boris Nagaev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAFC_Vt6Tv73tuF20MPpC7MiA5n6TfUwj%2BSOacCMTT%3D9roHkKAw%40mail.gmail.com.
