Hi AdamISZ/waxwing, I discussed with the maintainers, and we do consider MuSig2 and adaptor signatures to be in-scope. However, we don't currently plan to proactively add these features ourselves.
The reason the library currently contains an implementation of BIP 340 and not only raw elliptic curve operations is that we use BIP 340 in the ChillDKG reference code. So if there is demand to specify a scheme that is based on MuSig2 or adaptor signatures, then a similar reasoning would apply. MuSig2 would be particularly easy to add because it already has a python reference implementation and test vectors. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/a378e1a6-3e0b-4c55-a6fb-58099eb97798%40gmail.com.
