> I suppose that miners already use -blockmintxfee=0 or anything lower > than the default value because there are transactions with fees as low > as 0 (zero) in the blocks.
It seems more likely that they used the prioritisetransaction RPC [0] in order to include only those 0 fee transaction that they were paid for (via lightning, creditcard). > I can't see how minrelaytxfee=0.00000001 could increase risk of DoS > attack or make it significantly cheaper or more effective. There are > the default 300MB size limit for mempool and 336 hours timeout for > unconfirmed txs. They limit impact of a low fee-rate txs DoS attack > making it ineffective. I could quote Donald Rumsfeld, but instead I'll point out that you're forgetting about bandwidth, memory[1] and CPU usage. - Sjors [0] https://bitcoincore.org/en/doc/28.0.0/rpc/mining/prioritisetransaction/ [1] e.g. https://bitcoincore.org/en/2024/10/08/disclose-large-inv-to-send/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2F74C8F3-F1E1-4714-A4B4-03169E7CF597%40sprovoost.nl.
