bitcoindev

Messages by Date

2026/02/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo
2026/02/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Antoine Riard
2026/02/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo
2026/02/11 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v29.3 Released Sebastian Kung
2026/02/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Erik Aronesty
2026/02/11 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Output Script Descriptor Annotations Craig Raw
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Erik Aronesty
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'Brandon Black' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/10 [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Mike Casey
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Bip54: add sequence, timestamp (and version) to GBT Melvin Carvalho
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Bip54: add sequence, timestamp (and version) to GBT Sjors Provoost
2026/02/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Jonas Nick
2026/02/09 [bitcoindev] Bip54: add sequence, timestamp (and version) to GBT Sjors Provoost
2026/02/09 [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
2026/02/07 [bitcoindev] New bitcoin backbone code release: BIP152, outbound tx support + libbitcoinkernel API feedbacks Antoine Riard
2026/02/05 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/02/04 [bitcoindev] BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max) Sebastian Falbesoner
2026/02/02 [bitcoindev] SImple quantum security, at the expense of slower tx time Erik Aronesty
2026/02/02 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA verification can compete with ECC 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/02/02 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal Giulio Golinelli
2026/02/02 [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unbreaking testnet4 'Angelo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/02/02 [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unbreaking testnet4 'Angelo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Antoine Riard
2026/01/28 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/27 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/26 [bitcoindev] libsecp256k1 0.7.1 released Pieter Wuille
2026/01/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal waxwing/ AdamISZ
2026/01/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal cassio gusson
2026/01/25 [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA verification can compete with ECC 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal waxwing/ AdamISZ
2026/01/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal Giulio Golinelli
2026/01/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal Giulio Golinelli
2026/01/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Chris Riley
2026/01/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Galois Field
2026/01/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Pepe Hodler
2026/01/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/22 [bitcoindev] Re: Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal waxwing/ AdamISZ
2026/01/22 [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unbreaking testnet4 'Angelo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/21 [bitcoindev] Garbled Circuit and Channel Jamming Antoine Riard
2026/01/21 [bitcoindev] Falcon Post-Quantum Signature Scheme Proposal Giulio Golinelli
2026/01/21 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Claire Ostrom
2026/01/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment Giulio Golinelli
2026/01/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment 'bnv' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unbreaking testnet4 Saint Wenhao
2026/01/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/18 [bitcoindev] Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unbreaking testnet4 'Angelo' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/18 [bitcoindev] Re: QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment Giulio Golinelli
2026/01/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2026/01/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Murch
2026/01/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Tim Ruffing
2026/01/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Sjors Provoost
2026/01/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Bryan Bishop
2026/01/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Murch
2026/01/13 [bitcoindev] QRAMP addition: Alternative to legacy freeze: “quarantine-mode” legacy spends via two-phase destination commitment 'bnv' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Mubarek Juhar
2026/01/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Ruben Somsen
2026/01/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Coperbyte Solutions
2026/01/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Antoine Riard
2026/01/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Antoine Riard
2026/01/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2026/01/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Jonas Nick
2026/01/11 [bitcoindev] Safe Redaction: an early draft BIP Lazy Fair
2026/01/10 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.2 Released fanquake
2026/01/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.2rc1 Released /dev /fd0
2026/01/09 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.2rc1 Released fanquake
2026/01/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Chris Stewart
2026/01/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Matt Corallo
2026/01/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Matt Corallo
2026/01/08 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter? Matthew Husák
2026/01/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Sjors Provoost
2026/01/07 [bitcoindev] Re: Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 Antoine Riard
2026/01/07 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter? Murch
2026/01/06 [bitcoindev] BIP Idea: incrementalrelayfee in feefilter? Matthew Husák
2026/01/06 [bitcoindev] Follow-up regarding Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2026/01/05 [bitcoindev] Wallet Migration Failure May Delete Unrelated Wallet Files In Bitcoin Core 30.0 and 30.1 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/03 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Funding model question — unpaid exploratory work at intake Chris Stewart
2026/01/02 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core v30.1 Released fanquake
2026/01/01 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format 'Oren' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/01 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format 'Oren' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2026/01/01 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format waxwing/ AdamISZ
2026/01/01 [bitcoindev] Re: Funding model question — unpaid exploratory work at intake Able One
2026/01/01 [bitcoindev] Addressing remaining points on BIP 54 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/30 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Antoine Riard
2025/12/28 [bitcoindev] BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format 'Oren' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/26 [bitcoindev] QRMVL: Modular Verification Layer for Post-Quantum Hash-Based Signatures Karin Eunji
2025/12/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Unbreaking testnet4 Saint Wenhao
2025/12/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future david torrealba
2025/12/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. waxwing/ AdamISZ
2025/12/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Greg Maxwell
2025/12/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Major BIP 360 Update Erik Aronesty
2025/12/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. John
2025/12/22 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Sebastian Falbesoner
2025/12/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction Defenwycke
2025/12/22 Re: [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction Murch
2025/12/20 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Erik Aronesty
2025/12/19 [bitcoindev] CTV activation meeting #1 Notes /dev /fd0
2025/12/19 [bitcoindev] Major BIP 360 Update Hunter Beast
2025/12/19 [bitcoindev] Secondary mailing list for moderated emails /dev /fd0
2025/12/19 Re: [bitcoindev] op_ctv still has no technical objections 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/19 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Peer Feature Negotiation Anthony Towns
2025/12/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Jonas Nick
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Greg Maxwell
2025/12/18 [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Erik Aronesty
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Pepe Hodler
2025/12/18 [bitcoindev] Re: Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade Erik Aronesty
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] op_ctv still has no technical objections Erik Aronesty
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction defenwycke
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Henry Romp
2025/12/18 [bitcoindev] Perhaps the simplest possible quantum-security upgrade Erik Aronesty
2025/12/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Jonathan Voss
2025/12/16 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Jonas Nick
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Josh Doman
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration Henry Romp
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration Garlo Nicon
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Greg Maxwell
2025/12/15 Re: [bitcoindev] The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Nona YoBidnes
2025/12/15 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add PSBT_IN_SP_TWEAK field 'nymius' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/14 [bitcoindev] Re: Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic Antoine Riard
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Antoine Riard
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Josh Doman
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Greg Maxwell
2025/12/14 [bitcoindev] Does GCC preclude a soft fork to handle timestamp overflow? Josh Doman
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Oghenovo Usiwoma
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval victor perez
2025/12/14 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Greg Maxwell
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust 'uuowwpevskfcordh' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval victor perez
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Melvin Carvalho
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration Henry Romp
2025/12/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Ataraxia 009
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The Cat, BIP draft discussion. Greg Maxwell
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction Murch
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction Defenwycke
2025/12/12 [bitcoindev] Re: Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction Jonathan Voss
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration Ethan Heilman
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration Possibly
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
2025/12/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 pyth
2025/12/11 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Oghenovo Usiwoma
2025/12/11 Re: [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/11 [bitcoindev] Draft BIP: DustSweep – policy-only UTXO dust compaction defenwycke
2025/12/11 [bitcoindev] Feedback on a simple 2-path vault design (2-of-2 + CLTV recovery) and use of pruned nodes for UTXO retrieval victor perez
2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Eric Voskuil
2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Erik Aronesty
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Re: Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust Eric Voskuil
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] [Discussion] Year 2106 Timestamp Overflow - Proposal for uint64 Migration אושר חיים גליק
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Re: Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic defenwycke
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain (now on GitHub) Lazy Fair
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Q-Lock: Quantum-Resistant Spending via ECDSA + Hash-Based Secrets Amarildo
2025/12/10 [bitcoindev] Reducing RAM requirements with dynamic dust 'uuowwpevskfcordh' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Jonas Nick
2025/12/10 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Peter Todd
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Olaoluwa Osuntokun
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Olaoluwa Osuntokun
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/09 [bitcoindev] CTV activation meeting on IRC - Thursday 18 December 17:00 UTC /dev /fd0
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Boris Nagaev
2025/12/09 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
2025/12/09 [bitcoindev] Re: Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Boris Nagaev
2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/08 [bitcoindev] Request for early peer review of two BIP drafts (BUDS and segOP) Callum
2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future Greg Maxwell
2025/12/08 [bitcoindev] Hash-Based Signatures for Bitcoin's Post-Quantum Future 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/08 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Nagaev Boris
2025/12/04 [bitcoindev] Splitting more block, addr and tx classes of network traffic Antoine Riard
2025/12/04 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
2025/12/04 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Oghenovo Usiwoma
2025/12/04 [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add sp() output descriptor format for BIP352 Craig Raw
2025/12/02 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2025/12/02 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Murch
2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Peter Todd
2025/12/01 Re: [bitcoindev] SLH-DSA (SPHINCS) Performance Optimization Techniques Nagaev Boris
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] Motion to Activate BIP 3 Melvin Carvalho
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] op_ctv still has no technical objections /dev /fd0
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Greg Maxwell
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Erik Aronesty
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain waxwing/ AdamISZ
2025/11/29 Re: [bitcoindev] A safe way to remove objectionable content from the blockchain Erik Aronesty