Thanks Gregory - to be clear should Native P2WPKH scripts only appear in redeem 
scripts?  From reading the various BIPs it had seemed like Native P2WPKH and 
Native P2WSH were also valid and identifiable if they were encoded in TxOuts.  
The theoretical use case for this would be saving bytes in Txes with many 
outputs.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory Maxwell [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 10:04 AM
To: Alex Nagy <[email protected]>; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] P2WPKH Scripts, P2PKH Addresses, and Uncompressed 
Public Keys

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Alex Nagy via bitcoin-dev 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If Alice gives Bob 1MsHWS1BnwMc3tLE8G35UXsS58fKipzB7a, is there any 
> way Bob can safely issue Native P2WPKH outputs to Alice?

Absolutely not. You can only pay people to a script pubkey that they have 
specified.

Trying to construct some alternative one that they didn't specify but in theory 
could spend would be like "paying someone" by putting a cheque in a locked safe 
labeled "danger radioactive" that you quietly bury in their back yard.  Or 
taking the payment envelope they gave you stuffing it with cash after changing 
the destination name to pig latin and hiding it in the nook of a tree they once 
climbed as a child.

There have been technical reasons why some wallets would sometimes display some 
outputs they didn't generate but could spend, but these cases are flaws-- 
they're not generic for all cases they could in theory spend, and mostly exist 
because durability to backup recovery makes it impossible for it to tell what 
it did or didn't issue.

So regardless of your query about uncompressed keys, you cannot do what you 
described: Wallets will not see the payment and may have no mechanism to 
recover it even if you tell the recipient what you've done. And yes, the use of 
an uncompressed yet could later render it unspendable.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to