On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:32:21PM +0000, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > [email protected] (Job Snijders) wrote: > > > Of note - it is good practise to keep the table: it's 'more neighborly'! > > > > Keeping the import table can help reduce the sending of BGP > > ROUTE-REFRESH messages (which are costly for your peers). > > Oh yeah, I'd never not do it on "real routers", but these are anycast nodes > advertising two prefixes that never change (only might go away or reappear), > so > I'm not concerned. CPU churn at these nodes is minimal anyway, but hey, what's > two more tables, right? ;-) > > Thanks for your kind help folks!
To clarify, the suggestion is about reducing the burden on the peers of your anycast nodes :-) And as bonus - it probably resolves your logging issue! Win/win TWO BIRDS WITH ONE STONE *flies away* Kind regards, Job
