On May 15, Job Snijders via Bird-users <[email protected]> wrote:
> But please be very careful in considering this patch, because it does > introduce some subtle changes in the on-the-wire behaviour of BIRD. For > example, without this patch an UPDATE for a handful of routes and the > End-of-RIB marker might end up in the same TCP packet (if this fits); > but with this patch, the End-of-RIB marker ends up in its own TCP > packet. As things are today, setting TCP_NODELAY will increase the I think that this can be fixed easily with TCP_CORK. Basically, with TCP_NODELAY + TCP_CORK you can have the optimal balance of latency and overhead without using writev. -- ciao, Marco
