What about having the veth's in separate VRF's inside the netns's? Do you need the full BGP features on the Unix socket, or just a pipe-like transport? Not promising now that I'll implement it soon, just trying to define the feature request, yet it should be quite easy to create.
Maria On June 7, 2019 6:00:14 PM GMT+02:00, Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:44 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> >wrote: >> >> Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > We want to use bird with different namespaces too, but proposed >> > changes is not an option for us anyway because of somewhat >proprietary >> > kernel we are working with (there are some missing definitions for >> > namespaces in headers and vanilla does not fit). So we are also >> > thinking about several instances of bird as Maria Jan Matějka >> > suggests. But we need to find some way to interconnect them. But we >> > think creating a veth interface is not a best option for us. >> >> Why not? > >We do not want direct routing between namespaces. And also add some >additional interfaces - it is a hardware switch, so it could disturb >something. But may be not. This could be an option too. I just wrote >that it could be not the best one. We have not tested yet, just >considering possibilities. > >> >> -Toke -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
