On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 02:14, Ondrej Zajicek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 02:07:52PM +0700, Igor Podlesny wrote: > > I have test lab -- two OSPF routers, Bird 1.6.4: A, B. > > > > 2 areas defined: 0.0.0.0, 0.0.0.1. Export "all". > > > > When rfc1583compat is Off I observe default route gets propagated via > > area 0.0.0.1 in despite its interfaces have higher costs than area > > 0.0.0.0's have. > > > > Turning rfc1583compat On changes it to expected behaviour: interfaces > > costs are respected again. > > > > Bug or am I missing some piece of OSPF knowledge here? > > Hi > > I think it is correct. In OSPF, intra-area paths using non-backbone areas > are preferred over shorter backbone or inter-area paths. See RFC 2328, > section 16.4.1. And even higher interfaces costs shouldn't affect it? O_o -- End of message. Next message?
