On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > again, why you query for 250.0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa > under normal circumstances there's no point of querying that name. >
Well yes and no. While an individual user would typically not, resolvers sure will. While trying to resolve 250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa, it will eventually get to 250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa CNAME 250.0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa. Then it will need to resolve the canonical name, and a response like the original one that was shown will be clearly buggy. I say "possibly" because from my vantage, all three of ns{,1,2}.viettelidc.com.vn, the authorities for 0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa, are giving fine answers right now (on udp; blocked on tcp). This includes the originally reported problem IP, 115.84.177.8 -- tale _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users