Your point is taken, I looked at a very old Redhat system, although I'll note
that the pathnames under a chroot are not subject to the technical limitations
you mentioned.
- Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Reindl
Harald
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 6:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bind-chroot, runs, works, dies
Am 10.08.2017 um 00:35 schrieb Darcy Kevin (FCA):
> I’m not very familiar with Fedora, but on Redhat, at least, there is
> no /run directory
don't get me wrong but you are missing some years - /run is a important part of
the system for a long time because it is a) tmpfs and b) available at early
boot while /var maybe a later mounted filesystem
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/13972/what-is-this-new-run-filesystem
[root@hosting:~]$ stat /run
File: '/run'
Size: 560 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 11h/17d Inode: 9222 Links: 22
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2017-07-19 10:51:46.500000000 +0200
Modify: 2017-08-09 03:44:16.083351213 +0200
Change: 2017-08-09 03:44:16.083351213 +0200
Birth: -
[root@hosting:~]$ rpm -q --file /run
filesystem-3.2-21.el7.x86_64
[root@hosting:~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core)
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
