Sorry, it has a space, I just made an error by copying. Yes 192.168.201.2 is dropped because it uses source port 53. I don't have any iptables rule for this. I don't understand why there is a packet with source port 53.
On 12 March 2012 21:33, Chuck Swiger <cswi...@mac.com> wrote: > On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Romgo wrote: > > Here is my Iptables configuration for bind : > > > > # prod.dns.in > > $IPTABLES -t filter -A INPUT -j LOGACCEPT -p udp --dport 53 -i eth1-d > 192.168.201.2 -s 0/0 > > $IPTABLES -t filter -A INPUT -j LOGACCEPT -p tcp --dport 53 -i eth1 -d > 192.168.201.2 -s 0/0 > > Shouldn't the first line have a space before the minus within "eth1-d"? > > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > > >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users