Sorry, it has a space, I just made an error by copying.

Yes 192.168.201.2 is dropped because it uses source port 53. I don't have
any iptables rule for this.
I don't understand why there is a packet with source port 53.





On 12 March 2012 21:33, Chuck Swiger <cswi...@mac.com> wrote:

> On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Romgo wrote:
> > Here is my Iptables configuration for bind :
> >
> > # prod.dns.in
> > $IPTABLES -t filter -A INPUT -j LOGACCEPT -p udp --dport 53 -i eth1-d
> 192.168.201.2 -s 0/0
> > $IPTABLES -t filter -A INPUT -j LOGACCEPT -p tcp --dport 53 -i eth1 -d
> 192.168.201.2 -s 0/0
>
> Shouldn't the first line have a space before the minus within "eth1-d"?
>
> Regards,
> --
> -Chuck
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to