If Christiaan is able and willing to implement the hidden preference that Jason suggested, I see no reason to object, but I would object to the claim that "an 'Annote' or 'Abstract' field is going to have far too many characters to display any useful information": I have been displaying the Abstract field in the publications table for many years, and the presence or absence of content in that field (or any other field) in the publications table has been useful information for me. Of course, if one wants to see the whole field when there is a lot of content then one has to look at the preview pane using an appropriate template. I will note that smart groups can also be useful for keeping track of publications that are missing field content. Cheers, Nathan
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
