On Oct 26, 2014, at 13:56, Jan Jakob Bornheim wrote: > On 23 Oct, 2014, at 00:09, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Oct 22, 2014, at 22:52, Christiaan Hofman wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2014, at 19:50, Jan Jakob Bornheim wrote: >>> >>>> In Yosemite, BibDesk seems to no longer indicate the groups a selected >>>> publication is in. If I recall correctly, pre-Yosemite, the behaviour was >>>> that a dark grey or purple would indicate the currently selected group, a >>>> lighter shade of grey would highlight all other groups a selected >>>> publication is in. In Yosemite, I can no longer see this behaviour. See >>>> the attached screenshot. Since the selected publication is an article, the >>>> @article group should be highlighted. The selected publication is also a >>>> member of the static group "Th19: International Restitution Law” and of >>>> the “Thesis” group, but obviously, you will have to take my word for that. >>>> Neither of these two groups is highlighted. >>>> >>>> Can anybody confirm this is a software, rather than a user issue? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Jan Jakob >>>> <Screen Shot 2014-10-22 at 19.45.37.png> >>> >>> This may well be. It seems Yosemite is not using the documented method, >>> that we use, to draw the selection highlights. I have no idea what it is >>> using instead to draw the highlight, so I therefore have no idea how we >>> could get this back. >>> >>> Christiaan >>> >> >> >> Correct that, I think I found a way to bring it back. This should be >> available in the next nightly build (whenever that is, hopefully tomorrow) >> >> Christiaan > > Just downloaded the build from 2014-10-26 and it is back. Cheers! Personally, > I would say that the “secondary highlights” with their rounded borders look > even better than the primary selection, which is a plain rectangle (I > attached a screenshot because I am not sure whether the difference in > appearance is intentional; “!Starred” is the selected group with the primary > highlight, all the others are secondary highlights), but the important thing > is to have the functionality back. Thank you! > > Jan Jakob
Can't say, as I don't see the screenshots. It probably is unintentional, OSX has over time become a lot blander, while we have not changed these secondary highlights for quite a while. Christiaan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
