Update: Centos assures me that all host are down. On Sun, Jun 9, 2019, 1:41 PM Jonathan Engwall < engwalljonathanther...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Beowulf, > Recently we had serious trouble with the internet. A technician had to > climb the pole. Another technician, an IT specialist in Mexico City, could > not resolve the issue, sent the man here. > Now trouble is back. What does this mean? Where are the missing IPs? From > the pole to the modem, to my repeater, to my machine, and then my VM gives > this using nmap: > > Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2019-06-09 13:30 PDT > Initiating Ping Scan at 13:30 > Scanning 256 hosts [2 ports/host] > Completed Ping Scan at 13:31, 6.64s elapsed (256 total hosts) > Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 256 hosts. at 13:31 > Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 256 hosts. at 13:31, 0.04s elapsed > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.0 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.1 > Host is up (0.0080s latency). > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.2 > Host is up (0.00068s latency). > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.3 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.4 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.5 > Host is up (0.063s latency). > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.6 > Host is up (0.00068s latency). > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.7 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.8 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.9 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.10 [host down] > Nmap scan report for 192.168.0.11 [host down] > > Is this a new exploit? > Thank you, > Jonathan Engwall >
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
