On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:42:08 -0400 Gerald Henriksen <ghenr...@gmail.com> wrote:
... > Flang on the other hand is really at this point 2 projects, both > supported/developed by Nvidia. Well 3 projects in a sense. The original llvm flang (now mostly forgotten) can still cause confusion. It really would have been better if Nvidia handn't insisted on calling their PGI front-end flang.. And while it [nvidia flang] is probably the most functional of the three it has some major problems (including the, as I understand it, upstream unacceptable hack way of generating llvm ir). /Peter K > Flang is the current compiler that is either complete or reasonably > complete from a Fortran standpoint but requires various things to work > (a custom version of clang for example I believe). > > Also included under the Flang umbrella is f18, a new Fortran compiler > being written from scratch with the goal of it being a proper member > of the LLVM community, and they have interacted with the existing > LLVM/clang community to find the best way to proceed. > > In both cases (Flang/f18) they are traditional style compilers that > don't offer an interactive mode I believe. _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
