On 3/18/19 12:02 PM, Prentice Bisbal via Beowulf wrote:
Will,
Several years ago,when I was at Rutgers, Joe Landman's company,
Scalable Informatics (RIP), was trying to sell be on BeeGFS over
Lustre and GPFS. At the time, I was not interested. Why not? BeeGFS
was still relatively new, and Lustre and GPFS had larger install
bases, and
Yeah ... those were the days ...
therefore bigger track records. I was the only System admin in a group
with aspirations to be the one-stop shop for a very large research
institution, and to become a national-level HPC center. As a result, I
was more risk-adverse than I normally would be. I didn't want to take
a risk with a relatively unproven system, no matter how good it's
performance was. I also wanted to use a system where there was an
abundance of other sys admins with expertise I could lean on if I
needed to.
Fast forward 4-5 years, and the situation has completely changed. At
SC18, it seemed every booth was using or promoting BeeGFS, and
everyone was saying good things about it. If were in the same
situation today, I wouldn't hesitate to consider BeeGFS.
In fact, I feel bad for not giving it a closer look at the time,
because it's clear Joe and his team at his late company were on to
something and were clearly ahead of their time with promoting BeeGFS.
Thanks. I seem to be hearing this from many corners these days.
In simple terms, there are a few different risks. One is making a
choice on a smaller entity, a smaller market share participant providing
the services/support you need. Another risk is following the herd and
giving up the advantages that an alternative choice might bring.
BeeGFS is not a market risk. It is an established player, it works
well, the team is excellent, the code is excellent. Note: I have no
financial interest in BeeGFS's success/failure in the market as I am not
working on selling high performance storage and computing systems.
The smaller companies selling integrated packages of BeeGFS atop
reasonable designed hardware should likely be some of your first stops
in considering your options. They are far more focused/dependent upon
business than the big shops, and this translates into usually far
superior service. I'd suggest avoiding the majority of resellers, as
their business strategy is to steer you in a particular direction versus
working with you to design what you need (the smaller shops do this).
If you want to do this yourself atop your existing kit, go for it. Its
not hard to set up/configure.
--
Joe Landman
e: joe.land...@gmail.com
t: @hpcjoe
w: https://scalability.org
g: https://github.com/joelandman
l: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joelandman
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
https://beowulf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/beowulf