Thank you very much. Indeed, I believe that a comparative study among the different simulators would be nice to perform.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:55 PM Dave Love <dave.l...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Scott Atchley <e.scott.atch...@gmail.com> writes: > > > You may also want to look at Sandia's Structural Simulation Toolkit > > <https://sst.sandia.gov> and Argonne's CODES > > <https://www.mcs.anl.gov/projects/codes/>. > > And maybe smpi from SimGrid <http://simgrid.gforge.inria.fr/>, if you > can get or synthesize calibration data. The MPI (or its tuning) may be > rather important compared with the fabric, and is rarely properly > reported in benchmark results ☹. SimGrid, at least, can use different > collective algorithms; I don't know about the alternatives, or to what > extent these can model offloading and the various routing schemes in > use. A comparison would be interesting if anyone has one. > > <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7877012> has results for different > topologies and concludes that there's no generally best network. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
