I am curious what people think of git. On one hand everyone seems to
be using it and proclaiming its virtues. On the other hand it seems
way overkill for how the majority of people code.
I maintain dozens of scripts to manage various HPC environments . None
are more than a few hundred lines long. To do backups of scripts, I
just copy them to some backup folder. Occasionally I might tar them up
and copy them to a different server. I have never had a need to go
back to an older version of my script.
So I tried to learn git but find it very confusing. It seems designed
for teams of developers working on some million+ line of code project.
For my rinky-dinky scripts it just adds a lot of confusion. It seems I
need to "commit" to using git everyday in order for it to be
effective. Otherwise, use it or lose it.
Should I force myself to use git everyday? Or maybe find some
incrementally better way to manage backups of my scripts?
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
