That’s what we do, yes — NAT via the master node or similar appropriate node in 
your setup.

> On Apr 14, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Richter, Brian J {BIS} 
> <brian.j.rich...@pepsico.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We just built our first HPC and I have what seems like a rather dumb question 
> regarding best practices and compute nodes. Our HPC setup is currently small, 
> we have a HeadNode which runs MOAB/Torque and we have 4 compute nodes 
> connected with IB. The compute nodes are on their own private network. My 
> question is, what is the best way to handle software that requires licenses 
> to run on the compute nodes? For instance we are trying to get STARCCM+ up 
> and running on the cluster, the license server is on our general user 
> network, the headnode is also on the user network, but when we submit a job 
> to torque for STARCCM it keeps throwing errors that the software cannot 
> connect to the license server. Is it best practice to create a network path 
> from the compute nodes out to the license server through the HeadNode? I feel 
> like I’m missing something really simple here.
> 
> Thanks!

--
____
|| \\UTGERS,     |---------------------------*O*---------------------------
||_// the State  |         Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus
||  \\    of NJ  | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark
     `'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to