BeeGFS sounds interesting. Is it possible to say something general about how it compares to Lustre regarding performance?

/jon

On 02/13/2017 05:54 PM, John Hanks wrote:
We've had pretty good luck with BeeGFS lately running on SuperMicro vanilla hardware with ZFS as the underlying filesystem. It works pretty well for the cheap end of the hardware spectrum and BeeGFS is free and pretty amazing. It has held up to abuse under a very mixed and heavy workload and we can stream large sequential data into it fast enough to saturate a QDR IB link, all without any in depth tuning. While we don't have redundancy (other than raidz3), BeeGFS can be set up with some redundancy between metadata servers and mirroring between storage. http://www.beegfs.com/content/

jbh

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:40 PM Alex Chekholko <alex.chekho...@gmail.com <mailto:alex.chekho...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    If you have a preference for Free Software, GlusterFS would work,
    unless you have many millions of small files. It would also depend
    on your available hardware, as there is not a 1-to-1
    correspondence between a typical GPFS setup and a typical
    GlusterFS setup. But at least it is free and easy to try out. The
    mailing list is active, the software is now mature ( I last used
    GlusterFS a few years ago) and you can buy support from Red Hat if
    you like.

    Take a look at the RH whitepapers about typical GlusterFS
    architecture.

    CephFS, on the other hand, is not yet mature enough, IMHO.
    On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:31 AM Justin Y. Shi <s...@temple.edu
    <mailto:s...@temple.edu>> wrote:

        Maybe you would consider Scality (http://www.scality.com/) for
        your growth concerns. If you need speed, DDN is faster in
        rapid data ingestion and for extreme HPC data needs.

        Justin

        On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Tony Brian Albers <t...@kb.dk
        <mailto:t...@kb.dk>> wrote:

            On 2017-02-13 09:36, Benson Muite wrote:
            > Hi,
            >
            > Do you have any performance requirements?
            >
            > Benson
            >
            > On 02/13/2017 09:55 AM, Tony Brian Albers wrote:
            >> Hi guys,
            >>
            >> So, we're running a small(as in a small number of
            nodes(10), not
            >> storage(170TB)) hadoop cluster here. Right now we're on
            IBM Spectrum
            >> Scale(GPFS) which works fine and has POSIX support. On
            top of GPFS we
            >> have a GPFS transparency connector so that HDFS uses GPFS.
            >>
            >> Now, if I'd like to replace GPFS with something else,
            what should I use?
            >> It needs to be a fault-tolerant DFS, with POSIX
            support(so that users
            >> can move data to and from it with standard tools).
            >>
            >> I've looked at MooseFS which seems to be able to do the
            trick, but are
            >> there any others that might do?
            >>
            >> TIA
            >>
            >

            Well, we're not going to be doing a huge amount of I/O. So
            performance
            requirements are not high. But ingest needs to be really
            fast, we're
            talking tens of terabytes here.

            /tony

            --
            Best regards,

            Tony Albers
            Systems administrator, IT-development
            Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C,
            Denmark.
            Tel: +45 2566 2383 <tel:%2B45%202566%202383> / +45 8946
            2316 <tel:%2B45%208946%202316>
            _______________________________________________
            Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
            <mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored by Penguin Computing
            To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe)
            visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf


        _______________________________________________
        Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
        <mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored by Penguin Computing
        To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
        http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

    _______________________________________________
    Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org
    <mailto:Beowulf@beowulf.org> sponsored by Penguin Computing
    To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
    http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

--
‘[A] talent for following the ways of yesterday, is not sufficient to improve the world of today.’
 - King Wu-Ling, ruler of the Zhao state in northern China, 307 BC


_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit 
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Reply via email to