On 18/08/16 00:10, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > I wouldn't be so glad. You're still going to have to rewrite your code > as mentioned above to get any meaningful performance.
To be fair to Stu though he did post back in 2013 that he got good performance improvements on his codes on Xeon Phi for little initial effort, so that's why they're so attractive to him. http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2013-February/030963.html http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2013-February/030971.html To us though they've proved not that useful, we can only run them in accelerator mode (due to external constraints) and so we've had virtually 0 uptake. :-( All the best, Chris -- Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.org.au/ http://twitter.com/vlsci _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
