Was actually thinking of a clustered server setup using 64bit arm board if possible
On 2016-05-15 09:25, cbergst...@pathscale.com wrote: > Let me backup.. what's your goal? > Fun project using 32bit ARM? > ... ARMv8 aka ARM64 aka AArch64? > Actual work not using Intel? > > FROM: jaquilina > SENT: Sunday, May 15, 2016 14:55 > TO: cbergst...@pathscale.com; Carlos Linares Lopez > CC: beowulf@beowulf.org > SUBJECT: Re: [Beowulf] recommendations on ARM distro? > > What embedded boards would you recommend instead? > > Sent from Samsung tablet. > > -------- Original message -------- > From: cbergst...@pathscale.com > Date: 15/05/2016 08:51 (GMT+01:00) > To: Jonathan Aquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net>, Carlos Linares Lopez > <clina...@inf.uc3m.es> > Cc: beowulf@beowulf.org > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] recommendations on ARM distro? > > Imho a waste of time unless you're just doing a feasibility research project. > > Lame int, low FP, low core density and what networking is available.. > > FROM: Jonathan Aquilina > SENT: Sunday, May 15, 2016 14:45 > TO: Carlos Linares Lopez > CC: beowulf@beowulf.org > SUBJECT: Re: [Beowulf] recommendations on ARM distro? > > What is everyone's thoughts on raspi's for a cluster? > > On 2016-05-12 21:58, Carlos Linares Lopez wrote: > My first e-mail in the list, ...something I finally understand! :) > > I have a small cluster of 3 odroid u3 running Unbuntu 14.04 LTS (I do > have to update it these days to 16.04). I use condor and it works very > nicely > > You can see a short demo here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4QPX50u4rg > > El 12/5/16 a las 21:09, C Bergström escribió: On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:59 > AM, Mark Hahn <h...@mcmaster.ca> wrote: Hi all, > we have a (tiny) experimental ARM box - based on Cavium ThunderX, but have > run into basic issues with distros (ie, ARM+ldap+ubuntu=fail). > > If you're using ARM (on something bigger than a RPi), what distro are you > using? I don't have 1st hand experience with the combination you're > referencing above, but peanut gallery comments > > 1) I'd encourage you to retry the default Cavium provided OS - I > realize that the package manager may not be fun, but they have thus > far been good about software support for our needs > > 2) Fedora has put quite a bit of effort into their AArch64 distro > ------------ > I'm happy to connect you to people @ARM or @Cavium which is likely a > better support channel for critical software like this. > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
_______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf@beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
