On 10/03/2015 06:18 AM, Lechner, David A. wrote:
Hi
I am wondering if anyone on this list has benchmarked the impact of an
HCI solution on performance, or how this newest "next big thing"
compares to a new Linux/intel commodity solution?
[disclosure: we are in this space, so take anything I write with the
appropriate caution]
As with everything, there is a marketing bit and a real aspect.
Marketing HCI is another way for people to sell "similar" kit to what
they've done in the past, packaged in a different manner.
Real HCI is about driving efficiency, density, and performance way up,
while providing a simple mechanism to manage, run, analyze, and tune.
Software HCI is about glue code that you can, in theory, turn a
pile-o-rusty-pcs into a high performance and highly reliable system.
There are quite a few Marketing HCI "solutions" out there. Most of them
are repacked/warmed over systems that don't do terribly well in real
world use cases. (note: saying this from a competitive point of view,
so feel free to dispute/argue this) In many cases they package some sort
of commodity box, with lower end kit with a number of things to make a
"HCI" stack.
In short, if they are not providing their own high performance data
fabric, they aren't real HCI. And no, 10GbE is not a high performance
data fabric (IMO anyway).
Real HCI is all about driving performance, density, and efficiency way
up. This means you can do (far) more with often (far) less kit. Real
HCI should let you run bare-metal, containers, or VMs. There are caveats
with all of these, depending upon use case.
Is there some performance penalty fron the virtualization?
Additional layers are almost never free. Containers might be better for
HPC apps, though you will lose the isolation that VMs give you. If you
are doing VMs with virtual function pass through, chances are that a
container would be a better (performance) choice, though not one from a
safety standpoint.
How do price points per FloP compare?
... to what?
Is the advantage in the Systems administration, and is there a
comparable open source solution?
There isn't a complete HCI stack thats open source in the linux space.
Some might point to OpenStack and others, but really they are targeting
more of the cloud side (maximizing tenancy per system, as compared to
application performance and density that real HCI targets).
Beowulf is/was about targeting inexpensive and self controlled
performance. Freeing a computationally intensive worker from the
confines of a particular set of vendors, and enabling them to innovate
parallel solutions to their problems in a cost effective and efficient
manner. Real HCI is about leveraging very performant, dense and
efficient systems to solve a number of problems (not typically HPC, but
no reason why not). Cloud systems are generally about maximizing
tenancy/utilization of resources, and not so much about individual
application performance).
Thanks in advance for any insights.
Dave Lechner
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics, Inc.
e: [email protected]
w: http://scalableinformatics.com
t: @scalableinfo
p: +1 734 786 8423 x121
c: +1 734 612 4615
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, [email protected] sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
